🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear discussions with the United States as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat stated only diplomacy worked, and shared recent overtures had come from intermediaries to resume negotiations with the US government. He asserted Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Difficult Path

Araghchi is treading a difficult route since Iran does not want be seen to be acting from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more powerful in military terms and psychologically from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium on home soil that it will never give up" – the key factor of the impasse in the previous talks.

Previous Discussions Abruptly Concluded

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that concluded with the American leader declaring the sites had been obliterated. Afterward, European countries used their privilege to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was decided an local partnership with American involvement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that American atomic experts could function inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Position

Iranian officials said the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the offer could be revived in certain ways if talks resume.

Trump in recent days said he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to resume discussions, but privately Iranian officials claim they are not yet getting consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran states dialogue is not part of a show.

Negotiating Position

In his remarks to the forum, designed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi declared the two-week conflict showed the dispute could not be ended by combat operations. He stated the assaults commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and ended with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and coordination, making confidence challenging to reestablish.

Dialogue Stays the Final Answer

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had deserted negotiations; it was America and the European states that had repeatedly tried to enforce their demands during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be alive and continues the ultimate resolution to address disputes, but its criteria, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."

"Provided that they speak to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and respect, they will receive a response in the identical tone."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the battle of restoration and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We gained many lessons from this conflict; we have identified our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He added: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to eliminate, remains in place. The installations and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the will of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have developed stronger, more cohesive, and more backing of the administration and the nation in the aftermath of this attack."